Bounded Rationality and Alternating-Offer Bargaining
نویسندگان
چکیده
One form of bounded rationality is a breakdown in the commonality of the knowledge that the players are rational. In Rubinstein’s two-person alternating-offer bargaining game, assuming time preferences with constant discount factors, common knowledge of rationality is necessary for an agreement on a subgame perfect equilibrium (SPE) partition to be reached (if ever). In this note, assuming time preferences with constant costs of delay, we show that common knowledge of rationality is not necessary to reach always an agreement on a SPE partition. This result is robust to a generalisation, time preferences with constant discount factors and costs of delay, if the players are sufficiently patient.
منابع مشابه
Backward Induction or Forward Reasoning? - an Experiment of stochastic Alternating offer bargaining
Bounded rationality questions backward induction, which however, does not exclude such reasoning when anticipation is easy. In our stochastic (alternating offer) bargaining experiment, there is a certain first-period pie and a known finite deadline. What is uncertain (except for the final period) is whether there is a further period. Whereas backward induction requires information about all lat...
متن کاملAn novel ADM for finding Cournot equilibria of bargaining problem with alternating offers
Bargaining is a basic game in economic practice. Cournot duopoly game is an important model in bargaining theory and is well studied in the literatures. Recently, asymmetry information [20] and incomplete information [19], limited individual rationality [2] and slightly altruistic equilibrium [10] are introduced into bargaining theory. And computational game theory also comes into being a new h...
متن کاملCommitment in Alternating O¤ers Bargaining
We extend the Ståhl-Rubinstein alternating-o¤er bargaining procedure to allow players, prior to each bargaining round, to simultaneously and visibly commit to some share of the pie. If commitment costs are small but increasing in the committed share, then the unique outcome consistent with common belief in future rationality (Perea, 2010), or more restrictively subgame perfect Nash equilibrium,...
متن کاملCommitment in alternating offers bargaining
We extend the Ståhl-Rubinstein alternating-o¤er bargaining procedure to allow players, prior to each bargaining round, to simultaneously and visibly commit to some share of the pie. If commitment costs are small but increasing in the committed share, then the unique outcome consistent with common belief in future rationality (Perea, 2009), or more restrictively subgame perfect Nash equilibrium,...
متن کاملAn Experimental Study of Buyer-Seller Negotiation with One-Sided Incomplete Information and Time Discounting
We study a multi-period bargaining mechanism in which a seller negotiates with a buyer over the price of an indivisible good. It is common knowledge that the good has zero value to the seller. Its value to the buyer is privately known, distributed independently of the seller's value according to a distribution that is common knowledge. Bargaining proceeds as follows. The seller sets a price and...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- IGTR
دوره 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999